“Whether our movement can collectively and individually stand up to Trump today and insist that we will keep doing our work for safe abortion, whatever he and the anti-abortion movement throw at us, is a conversation we need to start having right away, and with our governments too. But the bottom line is, as in the past, that we either tell the man to keep his money – or we cave in, stay on the payroll. Either way we will take the consequences.”
According to data still being collected by Erica Chenoweth at the University of Denver and Jeremy Pressman at the University of Connecticut, marches were held in more than 500 U.S. cities, attended by an estimated 3.3 to 4.6 … Continued
All three can be found here. All three contain reports and discussion of legal cases on a wide range of sexual and reproductive health and rights topics heard in courts across sub-Saharan Africa.
On 11 January 2017, the Belfast Telegraph reported that a woman and her partner were on trial for allegedly using medical abortion pills to self-induce an abortion, and the term used by the Belfast Telegraph in the article for medical abortion pills was “poison”.
“The articles collected here address both the practical and the philosophical dimension of the problem of conscientious objection in healthcare. A wide range of positions are presented, criticised, and defended from philosophical, ethical, and legal perspectives.”
Following a vote today, 17 January, in the Constitutional Commission of the Chilean Senate, the fantastic news is: the abortion bill was approved by the Commission by a vote of three in favour and 2 against. It can now be taken to the floor of the full Senate.
This is some of the first language in a treaty body general comment reconciling adolescents’ evolving capacities with the ability to consent to sexual and reproductive health services, explicitly affirming adolescents’ autonomy and decision-making in the context of their sexual and reproductive health and rights, and addressing the issue of sexual consent for adolescents.
The Belfast Telegraph apparently always talks about medical abortion pills as “poison” in articles about these prosecutions, using the outdated terminology in the 1861 Offences against the Person Act, the antiquated law under which all the prosecutions are taking place. In fact the pills are on the WHO Essential Medicines List. The Northern Ireland Alliance for Choice has written to the newspaper many times to protest this misnomer but they still use it. The law itself is also still being used to prosecute women across the UK and in many former British colonies, where it also remains on the statute books.
The Court held that the differential treatment of girls and boys by these existing legal provisions, which permitted girls to marry underage with the consent of a third party (such as a parent or guardian) was discriminatory and infringed the right to equality.
City officials in Grande Prairie, in northwest Alberta province, rejected a confrontational advertisement for the side of the city’s municipal buses, which led to a two-year court battle between the anti-abortion group claiming the right to freedom of expression against the city’s authority to decide what is appropriate and what is not appropriate for putting on the side of their municipal buses.